🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you compare it to what the typical American pays. I can name multiple businesses who are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many federal military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would remain a better and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.